April 30, 2008

War on Terror: Nothing But Bad News

Increasingly, everywhere Americans look they see a discouragingly familiar story edging its way back onto their television screens. After a relatively quiet period, the "war on terror" has reared its ugly head once again. For most of us, it is no surprise. For others who have bought into the Administration's 'surge is working' line, this might come as somewhat of a shock. 041708f4343c101w

One has difficulty in choosing to look to Iraq or to Afghanistan for our daily dose of bad news.

In Afghanistan, it just gets worse and worse. Security has become so bad that at a recent military parade in Kabul, President Karzai was amidst raging gunfire as they played the national anthem. We witnessed VIPs, parliamentarians, the President's entourage and military officers ducking for cover as gunfire sounded in the background.

The United States Department today released data showing the worsening situation in the land of the Taliban and al-Qaida. Matthew Lee writes for The Huffington Post:

" Al-Qaida has rebuilt some of its pre-Sept. 11 capabilities from remote hiding places in Pakistan, leading to a jump in attacks last year in that country and neighboring Afghanistan, the Bush administration said Wednesday. Attacks in Pakistan doubled between 2006 and 2007 and the number of fatalities quadrupled, the State Department said in its annual terrorism report. In Afghanistan, the number of attacks rose 16 percent, to 1,127 incidents last year. The report says attacks in Iraq dipped slightly between 2006 and 2007, but they still accounted for 60 percent of worldwide terrorism fatalities, including 17 of the 19 Americans who were killed in attacks last year. The other two were killed in Afghanistan."

The United States military is calling for Afghanistan's own version of the surge. CNN reports that what we have sent an additional 3,500 troops but commanders in the field are calling for another 12,000 more. None of our allies have shown a willingness to increase their troop levels and so it appears that we might send that many more American troops. Meanwhile, to survive, much of the country, under the iron fists of local warlords, has seen an unprecedented acceleration of the heroin trade.

In Iraq, there had been a modest statistical decrease in the bombings throughout the last year but, sadly, they have recently and unrelentingly escalated. Even the supposedly securely reinforced "Green Zone" now appears to be under siege by bombings on a daily basis. And, with April registering 47 American soldiers dead - the highest monthly tally in seven months - this shameful quagmire keeps taking its terrible toll. Clearly, after five years of warfare in both countries, the results are appallingly disappointing. No one can claim in Iraq that the people are better off than they were five years ago. We seem to be no closer in Afghanistan in defeating those who caused September 11th.

Maybe it is time to review the entire process and see what is in our national interest and what options are open for alternative solutions.

April 03, 2008

Issues: The War is Missing in Action

4

You know we are in trouble when the person talking most about the war in Iraq is Senator John McCain.

The Democratic primary has taken a sad twist. Issues are disappearing. Somehow Reverend Wright and travel schedules and misstatements about Bosnia have become more important than Iraq, human rights, Zimbabwe, AIDS, torture, Afghanistan, and the American poor.

With the sinking economy, we see the primary discussions returning to the old 2000 and 2004 themes of tax breaks for the middle class. Don't get me wrong, this economy is taking a terrible toll on the Americans and they are desperate to hear anyone pleading their case. Yet the candidates reaching out to this important voter group seem to have lost their ability to talk in clear, precise terms.

Yet we Democrats champion programs that continually rejuvenate our economy by putting our people back to work rebuilding our nation's collapsing infrastructure. With all the new jobs we know we can expand our tax base and our ability to pay for these projects. Simple in concept, it still has proven to work over the years. Still, much of our infrastructure is in shambles and dangerously close to seriously effecting our ability to do business. In addition, such questionable structures as weakening dams, inadequate levees, etc leave many American lives in serious jeopardy.

However, like walking and chewing gum, we can deal with the middle class and the economy and still talk about other issues. Does anyone really believe that a major part of our economic malaise is not a result of the war in Iraq? We have poured nearly a trillion -- a trillion! -- of wasted dollars into this endless money pit. Not only have we have piled up record deficits, but vital domestic programs are being canceled left and right to finance this disaster. Even our brave troops are not well taken care of financially and the treatment they are receiving when they return home is shameful.

This war and this economy go hand in hand. The fate of America's poor depends on us ending this misguided misadventure. The belief in our own moral value as a nation demands we end the war now. Our ability to focus on domestic issues and actually have the money to pay for them is entirely tied to ending the war in Iraq.

Headlines around the world tell us this war has not disappeared. Lives are still being lost. Our injured -- a human tragedy in itself - are being returned daily to our shores. And our economy is in shambles because of the cumulative tally. Now is not the time to put this conflict on a back burner. In one week, the Reverend Wright non-issue got more play then the war in Iraq by the nation's media. Does this make any sense to anyone?

John Kennedy said in his acceptance speech to the Democratic Convention in Los Angeles in 1960,

" . . if we open a quarrel between the present and the past, we shall be in danger of losing the future . . . Today our concern must be with the future. For the world is changing. The old era is ending. The old ways will not do."

Let us return to real issues. Before it's too late.

March 24, 2008

Iraq: 4000 Dead

Articl8

March 19, 2008

Iraq: Five Endless Years

As five years have passed and we are perhaps days away from having the 4,000th American killed in action, it is hard to come up with original words to describe the continuing horror of Iraq. How many times can we revisit the dishonest entrance into this war, the death and destruction that it has caused, the loss of respect around the world and the extraordinary toll it has taken on our own economy? The real tragedy is that words, actions and prayers just don't seem to work in ending this hopeless quagmire.

No matter how many times we march, write or elect, the ability to scale back and end this war seems to elude us. We are even at a point where we are being told that the 'surge' is working even though Iraq's elected leaders still are inable or incapable of maintaining any reliable governmental stability. That being said, of course, when troops withdraw from certain areas violence invariably strikes once again. Just these past two weeks, suicide bombers have been back in play and in the news. Turkey has been conducting incursions into Iraq's borders creating a growing regional aspect of this nightmare. Iran's leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinijad, an historical enemy of Iraq, can, with days of notice, have a 'head of state' visit in Baghdad while our own elected leaders must sneak in without notice and under armed protection. Recent such American visitors, Vice-President Dick Cheney and Senator John McCain, just made clueless remarks about what a grand success the war has been.

Tell that to the Iraqi people who have suffered beyond description, emerging from the horrors of Saddam's regime only to encounter a cycle of mass violence, death and destruction. Entire neighborhoods lie in rubble, the infrastructure is in shambles, it is a rare family who has not experienced death in this war and democracy still seems far away. The conservative death toll of Iraq citizens approaches 200,000 with hundreds of thousands injured. Almost the entire upper and middle classes have fled as refugees to other nations. Sunni and Shiite appear to be no closer together. And as reported in The New York Times last Sunday, massive black market corruption has overwhelmed the country, especially with regards to the oil production. Grand success, indeed.

And the price we have paid as a nation and a people is nearly as impossible to total.

The young men and women who have given their lives at their nation's call deserve our respect and honor. The tens of thousands of seriously injured demand our attention, assistance and good will. Those who have gone to Iraq in a spirit of helping to create good out of the bad should also be remembered for their bravery. The journalists who day in and day out have placed their own lives at risk to bring us the story and the truth also should be saluted. The dedication and heart all have displayed is, well, heartbreaking.

Now it has become abundantly clear that our economy is a total wreck. In tandem with the housing sub-prime loan debacle, the other main reason for our fiscal woes can be traced directly to this war. The billions and billions and billions and billions that have been wasted on this futile effort is astounding. With those funds, our nation could have been put to work rebuilding our infrastructure, teachers could have been hired, children could have received healthcare, schools could been built, college tuitions could have been paid for, the homeless could have had homes and New Orleans could be thriving! Instead, we continue to pour money down the drain in a dishonest and misguided misadventure. The madness is more than maddening: it is dangerously psychotic.

Wrong is wrong. This war was wrong from the start. This war has been wrong for the last five years. This war is wrong now.

It is time to stop throwing around meaningless words like "Surrender" and "Victory" in reference to this struggle. One thing the woebegone Bush Administration has successfully proved is that a conventional war will never solve the horror of terrorism. Brighter minds with better ideas need to be elected in November. In the meantime, let's bring our sons and daughters home so they help heal and rebuild America.

January 16, 2008

Iraq: On the Lighter Side; The Singing Marines!

For the last several years, we have witnessed one horror after another coming out of Iraq. The one consistent factor has been the amazing strength and courage of our servicemen and women. They have served this nation with honor and sacrifice. I have written many serious posts on the Iraq War and I thought it was time for a lighter touch. Please enjoy the following video from our men in Iraq.

January 13, 2008

Remember Iraq?

As the presidential campaign increasingly focuses on the worsening economy and other domestic issues, the war in Iraq has faded into the background. Just this week, President Bush said we could be there for 10 more years and Senator McCain grandly proclaimed that 100 years of occupation would be perfectly fine with him. There was hardly a ripple of protest from anyone. Iraq_dead_2

I recently learned that nine American soldiers had died in Iraq over just two days when reading page 12 in the New York Times, as I skimmed other news of apparent less importance. There was a time when such tragic news would have been above the fold on the front page. We are rapidly approaching a heartbreaking milestone - the 4,000th American death in Iraq. Still, we seem to have put the debate around the war on the back burner.

Of course, millions of Americans are having trouble finding good jobs, paying for fuel, heating their homes and obtaining quality healthcare for their families. Social Security and Medicare are in real trouble, too. These issues are important and drive our daily quality of life as citizens, but why do people think we are in such economic trouble? According to the National Priorities Project, the war is costing us $275 million every single day! So far, each household has paid $4,100 for the war.

Heathcare
Last year the war cost us $137.6 billion! Listen carefully - we could have provided 39,240,332 people with full healthcare coverage with these funds! Almost every American without health insurance could have received healthcare services last year.

Education
For the cost of the war in 2007, we could have sent more than 22,000,000 students to college. Not only are our young people dying in Iraq, we are handicapping the future of those still here at home.

Employment
Imagine the jobs we could have created by investing in American the $485 billion we have spent so far in Iraq! We could have repaired our crumbling infrastructure, build new “green” transit systems and expanded educational institutions. Our ability to stimulate the economy and to raise the standard of living for poor and middle class Americans has been dramatically impacted by the war in Iraq.

Terrorism
During the presidential campaign, we have heard endlessly how terrorists might exploit our under-secured ports. With the money spent in Iraq last year, we could have hired more than 2,000,000 port container inspectors!

Anyway you cut it, the war in Iraq is devastating this nation's potential for greatness. It is killing some of our best and most promising young people, draining our military preparedness and making economic recovery impossible.

Finally, the war has destroyed our position in the world and thereby our ability to deal with other emerging crises in Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan. It would be naïve to think that the agents of war and instability in these nations and around the world are not exploiting our weakened position.

Further, this war has marginalized our efforts to fight HIV/ AIDS and other diseases, feed the hungry, end poverty, and mediate civil wars that are killing millions. President Bush and others like to say that America is the guiding light of freedom in the world, but it’s clear that the Iraq War casts a long and sinister shadow.

Some say there was a lower turnout among young in New Hampshire. Maybe it was because we have stopped discussing this war in the campaign. That it is hardly being debated at all anymore in Congress. Or, that the candidates have started following the polls instead of their values and principles.

The war in Iraq has made every aspect of our life worse. Without a doubt, it is the single greatest factor that our economy is in danger.

So, is the economy the biggest issue in the campaign? I say, it’s the war, stupid.

Foto3top_2

November 26, 2007

Gay City News: Michael T. Luongo Reporting From Iraq

More than any other publication, The Gay City News has written about the plight of the LGBT community overseas. One of its star writers, Doug Ireland, has reported about the plight of gay men in Iran over the last few months. His coverage has been impressive and ground-breaking. Mike_luongo_plane_bghad_barnes_bihi

This week, The Gay City News, printed a long and powerful piece by Michael T. Luongo, who went to Iraq to find out the truth about the current status of the LGBT community in Iraq. Handsome and an extraordinary writer, Michael joins the ranks of Sebastian Junger and Robert Kaplan in making the world their writing pad. These great journalists and writers fly directly into the world hotspots to find truth and pass it on to us. Having someone as accomplished as Michael reporting directly from Iraq on the LGBT community is a real gift. Michael has focused on the Middle East for his writings as Kaplan focused on The Balkans and Junger on adventure. In fact, he captures the substance and adventure of both of these talented writers.

The Gay City News piece is a must read. Michael captures the horrors that face many members of the LGBT community:

"Here I met Saleem, Sirwan's handsome friend from Baghdad; Sarkis, a Kurdish-American who wore army clothes and had bruises on his face he said came from an Improvised Explosive Device; and Dozan, a tall, thin Freddie Mercury look-alike visiting from Sweden, where he had moved 10 years ago. Dozan struck me as daring, often leaving to talk to men who sat alone. His interactions sometimes led to more than conversation. These contacts in time got him into trouble; about a month after visiting Suleymania, I learned that Dozan had been arrested and medically tortured by the Kurdish police.

By phone, Dozan told me, "I met a man and we were kissing, and a little hugging also. And someone discovered that in the park and called the police." He explained that "they took us to the hospital and they tested us to see if they could find some sperm" in his anus using a medical probe in what was a painful procedure.

Dozan said they "brought us to the police station. We were transferred into another room and there was no fan and no light, but it was a big hole in the wall. They looked into that small hole in the wall and they threw also a lot of shit words to us."

Suleymania might be liberal for Kurdistan, but clearly it is not that way for gays. Still, Kurdistan paled in comparison to reports of repression and outright murders of gay men in Baghdad, much of it originally brought to the attention of the West by journalist Doug Ireland."

Luongo also placed himself at risk in Baghdad:

"Getting into the Red Zone for the interview I had set up with one of Ali Hili's contacts put me in mind of a James Bond movie. Well, sort of. I was met at CPIC by a security man, a handsome Brit with a gun and piercing blue eyes, though his car was a beat-up Toyota driven by an overweight Iraqi. The hotel where I had my interview was only about a mile away, but this being Baghdad, it was well more than an hour before we arrived there.

The British security outfit operates as much under the radar as possible, and this meant crossing checkpoints not like an occupier - that is, easy passage with the flash of a badge - but as locals. Our first obstacle came almost immediately - a checkpoint where we waited with everyday Iraqis for body checks, car inspections, and weapons searches, as I beat back an impending sense that something terrible could happen at any moment.

Right after we cleared that and our car began to move away from the checkpoint, it came under attack from mortar fire. My guards acted as if it were an everyday occurrence, which of course for Baghdad it is. I found the experience surprisingly exciting, my head moving with each ear-piercing boom, which my caretakers misinterpreted as fear. "

He makes clear that the status for the LGBT community is the same or even worse than before the invasion by American forces:

"The American official I was urged to speak with, asked about the difficulties of discerning the truth behind the killings in Baghdad and which ones might be due to the victim being gay, said, "It's part of Iraqi culture to be dramatic about things and exaggerate, but I don't think with this that's the case." The difficulties for gays in Iraq, he said, have worsened since the previous regime, but they were far from perfect then either.

"Even under Saddam, it was bad," he said. "They didn't have Internet, and they could not do large networking, but they had places, they had their small circles where they could socialize."

His words were nearly the same as what Ali Hili had told me when I began my work as the American official added, "I have even heard that there were clubs in hotels where they could meet. Some Iraqis say even though they could not be out, this was better than now:"

I expect we will be hearing a lot more from Michael T. Luongo and that is a good thing. 

November 19, 2007

Iraq: Mayor Anderson Says, "We Won't Take It Anymore"

Every once in a while, a politician or a community leader will give a speech that strikes a sensitive chord and reverberates across the entire nation. A speech by Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson, a longtime critic of the Iraq War, did just that a few weeks ago. His speech was compelling, moving and inspiring. I read his words and wondered why our presidential candidates can't match his soaring rhetoric and passionate condemnation of the war. While it’s long a read, I felt compelled to reprint the entire speech below. It is well worth your time to read and ponder.

"We Won't Take It Anymore" by Mayor Ross (Rocky) Anderson

MayorandersonToday, as we come together once again in this great city, we raise our voices in unison to say to President Bush, to Vice President Cheney, to other members of the Bush Administration (past and present), to a majority of Congress, including Utah’s entire congressional delegation, and to much of the mainstream media: “You have failed us miserably and we won’t take it any more.”

“While we had every reason to expect far more of you, you have been pompous, greedy, cruel, and incompetent as you have led this great nation to a moral, military, and national security abyss.”

“You have breached trust with the American people in the most egregious ways. You have utterly failed in the performance of your jobs. You have undermined our Constitution, permitted the violation of the most fundamental treaty obligations, and betrayed the rule of law.”

“You have engaged in, or permitted, heinous human rights abuses of the sort never before countenanced in our nation’s history as a matter of official policy. You have sent American men and women to kill and be killed on the basis of lies, on the basis of shifting justifications, without competent leadership, and without even a coherent plan for this monumental blunder.”

“We are here to tell you: We won’t take it any more!”

“You have acted in direct contravention of values that we, as Americans who love our country, hold dear. You have deceived us in the most cynical, outrageous ways. You have undermined, or allowed the undermining of, our constitutional system of checks and balances among the three presumed co-equal branches of government. You have helped lead our nation to the brink of fascism, of a dictatorship contemptuous of our nation’s treaty obligations, federal statutory law, our Constitution, and the rule of law.”

“Because of you, and because of your jingoistic false ‘patriotism,’ our world is far more dangerous, our nation is far more despised, and the threat of terrorism is far greater than ever before.

It has been absolutely astounding how you have committed the most horrendous acts, causing such needless tragedy in the lives of millions of people, yet you wear your so-called religion on your sleeves, asserting your God-is-on-my-side nonsense – when what you have done flies in the face of any religious or humanitarian tradition. Your hypocrisy is mind-boggling – and disgraceful. What part of “Thou shalt not kill” do you not understand? What part of the “Golden rule” do you not understand? What part of “be honest,” “be responsible,” and “be accountable” don’t you understand? What part of “Blessed are the peacekeepers” do you not understand?

Because of you, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, many thousands of people have suffered horrendous lifetime injuries, and millions have been run off from their homes. For the sake of our nation, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of our brothers and sisters around the world, we are morally compelled to say, as loudly as we can, ‘We won’t take it any more!’ ”

“As United States agents kidnap, disappear, and torture human beings around the world, you justify, you deceive, and you cover up. We find what you have done to men, women and children, and to the good name and reputation of the United States, so appalling, so unconscionable, and so outrageous as to compel us to call upon you to step aside and allow other men and women who are competent, true to our nation’s values, and with high moral principles to stand in your places – for the good of our nation, for the good of our children, and for the good of our world.”

In the case of the President and Vice President, this means impeachment and removal from office, without any further delay from a complacent, complicit Congress, the Democratic majority of which cares more about political gain in 2008 than it does about the vindication of our Constitution, the rule of law, and democratic accountability.

It means the election of people as President and Vice President who, unlike most of the presidential candidates from both major parties, have not aided and abetted in the perpetration of the illegal, tragic, devastating invasion and occupation of Iraq. And it means the election of people as President and Vice President who will commit to return our nation to the moral and strategic imperative of refraining from torturing human beings.

In the case of the majority of Congress, it means electing people who are diligent enough to learn the facts, including reading available National Intelligence Estimates, before voting to go to war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will jealously guard Congress’s sole prerogative to declare war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will not submit like vapid lap dogs to presidential requests for blank checks to engage in so-called preemptive wars, for legislation permitting warrantless wiretapping of communications involving US citizens, and for dangerous, irresponsible, saber-rattling legislation like the recent Kyl-Lieberman amendment.

We must avoid the trap of focusing the blame solely upon President Bush and Vice-President Cheney. This is not just about a few people who have wronged our country – and the world. They were enabled by members of both parties in Congress, they were enabled by the pathetic mainstream news media, and, ultimately, they have been enabled by the American people – 40% of whom are so ill-informed they still think Iraq was behind the 9/11 attacks – a people who know and care more about baseball statistics and which drunken starlets are wearing underwear than they know and care about the atrocities being committed every single day in our name by a government for which we need to take responsibility.

As loyal Americans, without regard to political partisanship -- as veterans, as teachers, as religious leaders, as working men and women, as students, as professionals, as businesspeople, as public servants, as retirees, as people of all ages, races, ethnic origins, sexual orientations, and faiths -- we are here to say to the Bush administration, to the majority of Congress, and to the mainstream media: “You have violated your solemn responsibilities. You have undermined our democracy, spat upon our Constitution, and engaged in outrageous, despicable acts. You have brought our nation to a point of immorality, inhumanity, and illegality of immense, tragic, unprecedented proportions.”

“But we will live up to our responsibilities as citizens, as brothers and sisters of those who have suffered as a result of the imperial bullying of the United States government, and as moral actors who must take a stand: And we will, and must, mean it when we say ‘We won’t take it any more.’”

If we want principled, courageous elected officials, we need to be principled, courageous, and tenacious ourselves. History has demonstrated that our elected officials are not the leaders – the leadership has to come from us. If we don’t insist, if we don’t persist, then we are not living up to our responsibilities as citizens in a democracy – and our responsibilities as moral human beings. If we remain silent, we signal to Congress and the Bush administration – and to candidates running for office – and to the world – that we support the status quo.

Silence is complicity. Only by standing up for what’s right and never letting down can we say we are doing our part.

Our government, on the basis of a campaign we now know was entirely fraudulent, attacked and militarily occupied a nation that posed no danger to the United States. Our government, acting in our name, has caused immense, unjustified death and destruction.

It all started five years ago, yet where have we, the American people, been? At this point, we are responsible. We get together once in a while at demonstrations and complain about Bush and Cheney, about Congress, and about the pathetic news media. We point fingers and yell a lot. Then most people politely go away until another demonstration a few months later.

How many people can honestly say they have spent as much time learning about and opposing the outrages of the Bush administration as they have spent watching sports or mindless television programs during the past five years? Escapist, time-sapping sports and insipid entertainment have indeed become the opiate of the masses.

Why is this country so sound asleep? Why do we abide what is happening to our nation, to our Constitution, to the cause of peace and international law and order? Why are we not doing all in our power to put an end to this madness?

We should be in the streets regularly and students should be raising hell on our campuses. We should be making it clear in every way possible that apologies or convoluted, disingenuous explanations just don’t cut it when presidential candidates and so many others voted to authorize George Bush and his neo-con buddies to send American men and women to attack and occupy Iraq.

Let’s awaken, and wake up the country by committing here and now to do all each of us can to take our nation back. Let them hear us across the country, as we ask others to join us: “We won’t take it any more!”

I implore you: Draw a line. Figure out exactly where your own moral breaking point is. How much will you put up with before you say “No more” and mean it?

I have drawn my line as a matter of simple personal morality: I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has voted to fund the atrocities in Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who will not commit to remove all US troops, as soon as possible, from Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has supported legislation that takes us one step closer to attacking Iran. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has not fought to stop the kidnapping, disappearances, and torture being carried on in our name.

If we expect our nation’s elected officials to take us seriously, let us send a powerful message they cannot misunderstand. Let them know we really do have our moral breaking point. Let them know we have drawn a bright line. Let them know they cannot take our support for granted – that, regardless of their party and regardless of other political considerations, they will not have our support if they cannot provide, and have not provided, principled leadership.

The people of this nation may have been far too quiet for five years, but let us pledge that we won’t let it go on one more day – that we will do all we can to put an end to the illegalities, the moral degradation, and the disintegration of our nation’s reputation in the world.

Let us be unified in drawing the line – in declaring that we do have a moral breaking point. Let us insist, together, in supporting our troops and in gratitude for the freedoms for which our veterans gave so much, that we bring our troops home from Iraq, that we return our government to a constitutional democracy, and that we commit to honoring the fundamental principles of human rights.

In defense of our country, in defense of our Constitution, in defense of our shared values as Americans – and as moral human beings – we declare today that we will fight in every way possible to stop the insanity, stop the continued military occupation of Iraq, and stop the moral depravity reflected by the kidnapping, disappearing, and torture of people around the world.

November 09, 2007

Iraq: Record Deaths, Individual Loss

This week it was announced that more United States soldiers have died in Iraq in 2007 than any year since the war began. While we are told that victory is at hand and progress is being made, the death and destruction continue. Very soon, the total number American deaths will top 4,000. And as we celebrate this terrible milestone, I bet Congress and the President will still be debating and posturing.

As I read the new headlines on Iraq this week, I noticed that they all seemed very impersonal. The media failed to capture the tragic loss that so many families and communities have experienced. While many lives and much talent have been lost, we rarely see the faces behind the headlines.

So, I searched for a while, until I found a story about Private Adam Muller of Richmond, Vermont. Muller was a gunner for the 10th Mountain Division, who arrived in Iraq just two months ago.

Private Muller was only 21-years-old and had recently married his high school sweetheart Michelle Nelson.

The Burlington Free Press wrote in their story of Private Muller's death:

“He was loved by everyone,” said Wells, whose son was best friends with Muller. “He was a very sweet young man. We’re all devastated and angry at the same time. I think we’re all angry about this war, that so many young men are dying needlessly.”

When Muller signed up in 2006 — to make money to pay off college loans — he was told he’d be providing security for top officials, but he was told two weeks before he shipped out that he’d be a gunner, Wells said.

“We were all very angry about that. He isn’t anyone who could ever hurt a flea,” Wells said Tuesday. “To put him behind a gun was the last thing he needed.”

Below is a picture of Private Muller and his wife Michelle at their high school prom from The Burlington Free Press. Need I say anything more?

Bilde_2 

November 06, 2007

Iraq: It's the Oil

Since the war in Iraq began, many have accused the Bush/Cheney administration of taking us to war for oil. In the early days of the war, those who suggested that securing oil was a primary motive were dismissed outright as extremists. Of course, the government said, we would never send our young to war for a natural resource. We went to Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction and restore democracy.

Crw_4678_rj_2Recently, some have begun to reexamine the "oil motive" by engaging in productive and thoughtful dialogue. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, a revered conservative intellectual, stated without caveats in his recent memoir, " I am sadden that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil." This from a man who is the insider's insider.

My friend and former United States Senator Tim Wirth recently sent me an article entitled "Its the Oil," written by Jim Holt and published last month in the London Review of Books. This thought provoking article argues that the deteriorating political and structural situation in Iraq may actually align with long-term strategic goals set by Bush/Cheney Administration to take control of Iraq’s vast oil reserves.

I urge you to read the entire article, but here are some extraordinary excerpts starting with an overview of the enormous oil wealth in Iraq;

"Iraq is ‘unwinnable’, a ‘quagmire’, a ‘fiasco’: so goes the received opinion. But there is good reason to think that, from the Bush-Cheney perspective, it is none of these things. Indeed, the US may be ‘stuck’ precisely where Bush et al want it to be, which is why there is no ‘exit strategy’.

Iraq has 115 billion barrels of known oil reserves. That is more than five times the total in the United States. And, because of its long isolation, it is the least explored of the world’s oil-rich nations. A mere two thousand wells have been drilled across the entire country; in Texas alone there are a million. It has been estimated, by the Council on Foreign Relations, that Iraq may have a further 220 billion barrels of undiscovered oil; another study puts the figure at 300 billion. If these estimates are anywhere close to the mark, US forces are now sitting on one quarter of the world’s oil resources. The value of Iraqi oil, largely light crude with low production costs, would be of the order of $30 trillion at today’s prices. For purposes of comparison, the projected total cost of the US invasion/occupation is around $1 trillion."

Holt notes that the American military is preparing for a long-term presence in Iraq:

"How will the US maintain hegemony over Iraqi oil? By establishing permanent military bases in Iraq. Five self-sufficient ‘super-bases’ are in various stages of completion. All are well away from the urban areas where most casualties have occurred. There has been precious little reporting on these bases in the American press, whose dwindling corps of correspondents in Iraq cannot move around freely because of the dangerous conditions. (It takes a brave reporter to leave the Green Zone without a military escort.) In February last year, the Washington Post reporter Thomas Ricks described one such facility, the Balad Air Base, forty miles north of Baghdad. A piece of (well-fortified) American suburbia in the middle of the Iraqi desert, Balad has fast-food joints, a miniature golf course, a football field, a cinema and distinct neighbourhoods – among them, ‘KBR-land’, named after the Halliburton subsidiary that has done most of the construction work at the base. Although few of the 20,000 American troops stationed there have ever had any contact with an Iraqi, the runway at the base is one of the world’s busiest. ‘We are behind only Heathrow right now,’ an air force commander told Ricks.

The Defense Department was initially coy about these bases. In 2003, Donald Rumsfeld said: ‘I have never, that I can recall, heard the subject of a permanent base in Iraq discussed in any meeting.’ But this summer the Bush administration began to talk openly about stationing American troops in Iraq for years, even decades, to come. Several visitors to the White House have told the New York Times that the president himself has become fond of referring to the ‘Korea model’. When the House of Representatives voted to bar funding for ‘permanent bases’ in Iraq, the new term of choice became ‘enduring bases’, as if three or four decades wasn’t effectively an eternity"

Using reasonable logic, Holt hypothesizes how the U.S. can maintain control of Iraq:

"But will the US be able to maintain an indefinite military presence in Iraq? It will plausibly claim a rationale to stay there for as long as civil conflict simmers, or until every groupuscule that conveniently brands itself as ‘al-Qaida’ is exterminated. The civil war may gradually lose intensity as Shias, Sunnis and Kurds withdraw into separate enclaves, reducing the surface area for sectarian friction, and as warlords consolidate local authority. De facto partition will be the result. But this partition can never become de jure. (An independent Kurdistan in the north might upset Turkey, an independent Shia region in the east might become a satellite of Iran, and an independent Sunni region in the west might harbour al-Qaida.) Presiding over this Balkanised Iraq will be a weak federal government in Baghdad, propped up and overseen by the Pentagon-scale US embassy that has just been constructed – a green zone within the Green Zone."

The author then says:

"Was the strategy of invading Iraq to take control of its oil resources actually hammered out by Cheney’s 2001 energy task force? One can’t know for sure, since the deliberations of that task force, made up largely of oil and energy company executives, have been kept secret by the administration on the grounds of ‘executive privilege’. One can’t say for certain that oil supplied the prime motive. But the hypothesis is quite powerful when it comes to explaining what has actually happened in Iraq. The occupation may seem horribly botched on the face of it, but the Bush administration’s cavalier attitude towards ‘nation-building’ has all but ensured that Iraq will end up as an American protectorate for the next few decades – a necessary condition for the extraction of its oil wealth."

Iraq_oil_map485_2

September 18, 2007

Courage: What is Fair To Expect Of The Democrats?

At times during our nation’s history, difficult and compelling policy issues have demanded courage from our political leaders, requiring them to rise above party concerns or political fears to provide real vision in a time of crisis. During the battle to end slavery, the women rights movement, the African-American civil rights struggle and the debate around the Vietnam War, courageous leaders gave us all voice in troubled times. _44061533_416damage

I had hoped, as a gay man, that I would see others be as courageous as Senator Russell Feingold on the marriage issue. Clearly, that is unlikely to happen in this election year. How embarrassing it was to watch the leading Democratic presidential candidates attempt to explain their positions on marriage at the HRC Forum. I doubt that any of them personally believed their own awkward attempts to explain why millions of Americans should be denied their constitutional rights.

The Iraq War, however, is another issue all in itself.

In fact, we can expand the Iraq issue to include Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Each day brings more death and devastation in these countries, while inching us closer to a wider conflict that could engulf the entire Middle East. We cannot wait any longer for real leadership.

I believe that Iraq has become one of the great moral issues of our time, rising above politics and any one party. If we fail to understand the impact the war might have on our long-term strategic interests, in the Middle East and beyond, and do not act accordingly, we will have done a grave disservice to future generations of Americans. If continue on as we have, there may come a day when it is simply too late for reasoned solutions and a tide of extremism is let lose upon the world from a number of nations.

Over the last several months, we’ve witnessed a number of resolutions fail to get through Congress and raucous debates on timelines for withdrawal. Meanwhile, cots have been placed outside the Senate and Bush has stifled the conversation with veto threats. Presidential candidates have offered solutions from Biden's partition to Obama’s plan to cut off funds until a timetable is established to Edwards’ unequivocal statement that the troops should redeploy now. Meanwhile, the Democrats in Congress are seeking to reassure the base that they are doing all they can do given Bush’s veto power and bully pulpit.

Maybe so, but I don't buy it. Maybe this is an issue that should bypass party affiliation. Perhaps each elected official should be judged on their own position and degree of leadership. Maybe concerned citizens should support primary challenges against Democrats who continue to support Bush’s policies. Certainly, the defeat of pro-war Democrats would send a powerful message of zero tolerance for continued incompetence in Iraq. _44061534_416injuredboy

Ironically, we have seen more courage from people who support the war like Lieberman and McCain, both of whom were willing to take unpopular stands to advocate continuing this policy. Say what you want, but they put their careers on the line for their personal beliefs.

We may soon see average Americans, who are concerned about their country, organize more massive demonstrations, civil disobedience and displays of outrage through non-violent action. I really don't know.

What I do know is that we are continuing to send our children to die in a war that was based on lies, deception and greed. We are continuing to destroy another nation and its people. And that Pakistan is on the edge of becoming a disaster and the Taliban have gained ground in Afghanistan, all while we are laying out plans for an air war in Iran.

We simply have to stop this madness.

What is reasonable to expect of the Democrats? I doubt much more will emerge from the party than we have been seeing. But we have every right to expect greatness from those seeking the presidency. We should demand to know their timetables for bringing the troops home. We should know how they feel about the increasing oppression in Pakistan. We should know without a doubt how they feel about a war against Iran. What are their plans?

No one can speak of the war more eloquently than Frank Rich of the The New York Times. More than any other individual, he has constantly and articulately given reasoned voice to opponents of the Iraq War. This past Sunday he wrote about what we should expect from our presidential candidates:

"It's also past time for the Democratic presidential candidates to stop getting bogged down in bickering about who has the faster timeline for withdrawal or the more enforceable deadline. Every one of these plans is academic anyway as long as Mr. Bush has a veto pen. The security of America is more important — dare one say it? — than trying to outpander one another in Iowa and New Hampshire.

The Democratic presidential candidates in the Senate need all the unity and focus they can muster to move this story forward, and that starts with the two marquee draws, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. It's essential to turn up the heat full time in Washington for any and every legislative roadblock to administration policy that they and their peers can induce principled or frightened Republicans to endorse.

They should summon the new chief of central command (and General Petraeus's boss), Adm. William Fallon, for tough questioning; he is reportedly concerned about our lapsed military readiness should trouble strike beyond Iraq. And why not grill the Joint Chiefs and those half-dozen or so generals who turned down the White House post of "war czar" last fall? The war should be front and center in Congress every day.

Mr. Bush, confident that he got away with repackaging the same bankrupt policies with a nonsensical new slogan ("Return on Success") Thursday night, is counting on the public's continued apathy as he kicks the can down the road and bides his time until Jan. 20, 2009; he, after all, has nothing more to lose. The job for real leaders is to wake up America to the urgent reality. We can't afford to punt until Inauguration Day in a war that each day drains America of resources and will. Our national security can't be held hostage indefinitely to a president's narcissistic need to compound his errors rather than admit them.

The enemy votes, too. Cataclysmic events on the ground in Iraq, including Thursday's murder of the Sunni tribal leader Mr. Bush embraced two weeks ago as a symbol of hope, have never arrived according to this administration's optimistic timetable. Nor have major Qaeda attacks in the West. It's national suicide to entertain the daydream that they will start doing so now. "

September 17, 2007

Truthout.com: Kevin Tillman on Brother Pat

In October, 2006, Kevin Tillman wrote this powerful piece which I just found on Truthout.com. I can't think of a better response to the nonsense that President Bush offered the nation on Thursday night.

After Pat’s Birthday
By Kevin Tillman

Editor’s note: Kevin Tillman joined the Army with his brother Pat in 2002, and they served together in Iraq and Afghanistan. Pat was killed in Afghanistan on April 22, 2004. Kevin, who was discharged in 2005, has written a powerful, must-read document.

Picture2It is Pat’s birthday on November 6, and elections are the day after. It gets me thinking about a conversation I had with Pat before we joined the military. He spoke about the risks with signing the papers. How once we committed, we were at the mercy of the American leadership and the American people. How we could be thrown in a direction not of our volition. How fighting as a soldier would leave us without a voice… until we got out.

Much has happened since we handed over our voice:

Somehow we were sent to invade a nation because it was a direct threat to the American people, or to the world, or harbored terrorists, or was involved in the September 11 attacks, or received weapons-grade uranium from Niger, or had mobile weapons labs, or WMD, or had a need to be liberated, or we needed to establish a democracy, or stop an insurgency, or stop a civil war we created that can’t be called a civil war even though it is. Something like that.

Somehow our elected leaders were subverting international law and humanity by setting up secreprisons around the world, secretly kidnapping people, secretly holding them indefinitely, secretly not charging them with anything, secretly torturing them. Somehow that overt policy of torture became the fault of a few “bad apples” in the military.

Somehow back at home, support for the soldiers meant having a five-year-old kindergartener scribble a picture with crayons and send it overseas, or slapping stickers on cars, or lobbying Congress for an extra pad in a helmet. It’s interesting that a soldier on his third or fourth tour should care about a drawing from a five-year-old; or a faded sticker on a car as his friends die around him; or an extra pad in a helmet, as if it will protect him when an IED throws his vehicle 50 feet into the air as his body comes apart and his skin melts to the seat.

Somehow the more soldiers that die, the more legitimate the illegal invasion becomes.

Somehow American leadership, whose only credit is lying to its people and illegally invading a nation, has been allowed to steal the courage, virtue and honor of its soldiers on the ground.

Somehow those afraid to fight an illegal invasion decades ago are allowed to send soldiers to die for an illegal invasion they started.

Somehow faking character, virtue and strength is tolerated.

Somehow profiting from tragedy and horror is tolerated.

Somehow the death of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people is tolerated.

Somehow subversion of the Bill of Rights and The Constitution is tolerated.

Somehow suspension of Habeas Corpus is supposed to keep this country safe.

Somehow torture is tolerated.

Somehow lying is tolerated.

Somehow reason is being discarded for faith, dogma, and nonsense.

Somehow American leadership managed to create a more dangerous world.

Somehow a narrative is more important than reality.

Somehow America has become a country that projects everything that it is not and condemns everything that it is.

Somehow the most reasonable, trusted and respected country in the world has become one of the most irrational, belligerent, feared, and distrusted countries in the world.

Somehow being politically informed, diligent, and skeptical has been replaced by apathy through active ignorance.

Somehow the same incompetent, narcissistic, virtueless, vacuous, malicious criminals are still in charge of this country.

Somehow this is tolerated.

Somehow nobody is accountable for this.

In a democracy, the policy of the leaders is the policy of the people. So don’t be shocked when our grandkids bury much of this generation as traitors to the nation, to the world and to humanity. Most likely, they will come to know that “somehow” was nurtured by fear, insecurity and indifference, leaving the country vulnerable to unchecked, unchallenged parasites.

Luckily this country is still a democracy. People still have a voice. People still can take action. It can start after Pat’s birthday.

September 13, 2007

John Edwards Responds to President Bush

September 09, 2007

Fallujah: Katie, What Were You Thinking?

Last week, Katie Couric traveled to Iraq to give the faltering CBS Evening News some credibility and a boost in the ratings. But by the time she left Fallujah, she might have proven that she has no business covering hard news.

Just think of Leningrad (St. Petersburg) or Sarajevo and the toll that war took upon those cities and their citizens. Books have been written of their struggle to survive against all odds. These were heroic people, no matter what their ideology, who lived amidst bombings, blockades, death and total devastation. They survived to rebuild and some how kept a connection to their city of old, refusing to let bombs destroy their culture.

300pxfallujah_2004Iraqis in the Al Anbar province city of Fallujah will have a mighty story to tell to future generations. Before the war, the city was a spiritual center with more than 200 mosques dotting its skyline. The city’s rich history goes back to Babylonian times and would make any people proud. At the beginning of the war, the city had a population of 350,000 (about the size of St. Louis). It was vital and growing metropolis in the Western section of Iraq. It was known as a stronghold for supporters of Saddam Hussein.

Then came the war and everything changed.

One of the most memorable quotes to emerge from the Vietnam War was, “We had to destroy the village to save it!” It came to represent the absurdity of the war and its impact on the people of Vietnam.

The same thing has happened to Fallujah. We destroyed the city to save it.

The battle for Fallujah was a horror for all involved, and especially for the civilians who called this city their home. During the battle for control, 9,000 of nearly 50,000 homes were totally destroyed and more than 66 percent of the remaining dwellings had serious damage. A third of the historic mosques lay in ruins and the others suffered damage. The entire city was largely reduced to rubble, with devastated infrastructure and scarce staples for basic survival, such as food and water.

Fallujah was one of the few places in Iraq where we used a form of napalm. Hundreds of civilians were killed or maimed in the battle including children. Thriving neighborhoods burned to the ground.

We destroyed the city to save it.

During her visit to Iraq, Couric sited Fallujah as an example of progress being made in Iraq.

A CBS News story from Baghdad stated:

Democracy_fallujah09CBS BAGHDAD, Iraq One week before Gen. David Petraeus is expected to give his report on U.S. progress in Iraq, CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric says she has already seen dramatic improvements in the country.

"We hear so much about things going bad, but real progress has been made there in terms of security and stability," Couric said Tuesday. "I mean, obviously, infrastructure problems abound, but Sunnis and U.S. forces are working together. They banded together because they had a common enemy: al Qaeda."

Couric traveled to the city of Fallujah in Anbar province, which U.S. forces entered in April 2003 and again in November 2004. That is the same city where, in house-to-house fighting, American forces uncovered nearly two-dozen torture chambers.

"We found numerous houses, also, where people were just chained to a wall for extended periods of time," U.S. military intelligence officer Major Jim West said back on Nov. 22, 2004.

"The face of Satan was here in Fallujah, and I'm absolutely convinced that that was true," said Marine Lt. Col. Gareth Brandl.

It is also the city where four American military contractors were set on fire, mutilated and hanged from a bridge by insurgents.

Now Fallujah is "considered a real role model of something working right in Iraq," Couric said.

Couric made no attempt to present an opposing view, nor did she analyze the broader context of why such large-scale rebuilding in Fallujah is necessary.

That idea that Couric considered Fallujah a “real model of something working right” is absurd. If anything, our experience in Fallujah is an example of what’s wrong, particularly that we are sacrificing so much money and blood to destroy a country only to rebuild it again, all without a realistic plan of execution or exit strategy. In addition, if the death of a thriving city, countless civilians and their cultural history is a “real model,” then we’re in real trouble.

Couric couldn't contain herself in proclaiming that progress was being made in Iraq when she stated, "I think everyone I talk to agrees that restoring basic services is really an imperative step in bringing society to Iraq."

If there were not total devastation to begin with, there would be no society to rebuild. We are not bringing civilization to Iraq - it existed for hundreds of years, long before we invaded the country.

September 03, 2007

Iran: More Complex Each Day

When the Bush administration first began to beat the war drum, I remember how hard it was for me, a life-long human rights activist, to withhold my support for removing Saddam. His abuse of power, including despicable acts torture and even genocide, made him a desirable target. After all, who could possibly be against removing such an evil person? Even though I didn't buy all the incredibly deceptive arguments made by the Bush Administration about weapons of mass destruction, I thought that I might be able to support the war because of the brutal nature of Saddam's dictatorship.

Of course, after I took a deep breath, stepped back and looked at the bigger pictured, I realized that if we were to justify the invasion by championing the removal of a brutal dictator, then there were worse regimes around the globe that should go first. We only have to look at the bloodbaths in the Congo, Zimbabwe, or even to the southern nations of the former Soviet Union, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. There is no shortage of dictators who rule nations where their people cry out for international help.

With Iraq, the results have been far worse than any of us who originally opposed the war expected. We knew it would kill thousands, destabilize the region, increase terrorism and bog us down in a never ending war. However, we never imagined that it would become the horror it has become in the region, killing scores of Americans and Iraqi civilians and creating dramatic long-term damage to our strategic national interest.

Iran_mapNow, the Bush administration is starting to beat war drum for Iran. We must pause and have a serious national debate on the consequences of any military action against Iran. Once again, we have the specter of nuclear weapons in the hands of an incredibly repressive theocracy led by a mad man, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. His rule has become increasingly oppressive, having jailed and tortured dissenters, sentenced homosexuals to death, imprisoned secular women and restricted the activities of students. Ahmadinejad and his government do not generate much sympathy.

There may be a case to be made for intervention by noting the development of nuclear weapons, the repression of Iran's populace and the nation’s destabilizing actions in Iraq. Meanwhile, Bush is escalating the rhetoric almost daily, building the case for war by creating a sense of inevitability. I wouldn't be shocked if I woke up one morning to hear that we had launched a surprise attack.

Nevertheless, I still strongly believe that the greatest nuclear threat lies in Pakistan, which has already demonstrated its nuclear capability and is increasingly unstable. There are still worse dictators than Ahmadinejad, whose shaky regime may eventually fail without much external pressure. It is questionable how much Iranian arms and support is being supplied to the insurgents in Iraq and it appears that just as much of our own weapons were stolen or illegally sold on the black market for use against our troops.

In this week's London Times, reporter Sarah Baxter writes that we are moving towards military confrontation with Iran:

"The Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive air strikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days, according to a national security expert.

Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.

Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus.”

Before we find ourselves in another impossible situation in Iran like, let’s have a serous national debate about the consequences of such an action.

This debate should not take place behind closed doors, as Congress was duped quicker than we were when contemplating war with Iraq. There are some very serious issues that lead me to be very skeptical, if not outright opposed, to intervention in Iran.

How would military action against Iran affect or expose our 160,000 troops in Iraq? Would intervention further destabilize the region or embolden radical Islamists, particularly in Pakistan? Would our action motivate more peaceful yet disaffected Muslims to join the ranks of radical terrorists, thereby increasing the global terrorist threat?

Right now, it is hard to get our government to do the right thing in Iraq, let alone discuss Iran without the strident nationalistic rhetoric that can only take us to war instead of reasoned thought.

August 20, 2007

Iraq: The Killing Hasn't Stopped

Almost 40 years ago, as an anti-war activist committed to ending the war in Vietnam, I observed a cycle of public interest in an unpopular war. Today, I am disturbed to see the same cycle at work.

Predictably, there is enormous public interest at the outset of war. There are hot debates, fierce battles and public uproar. Then, a period of complacency follows, when people seem to become distracted from the blood and gore.Iraq179 

As casualty rates decrease or even remain steady, the media and the public tend to take a break from the war and focus on other issues. Meanwhile, nervous politicians who wonder if they are on the wrong side of the issue politically, fail to vigorously advance anti-war proposals. Then some huge atrocity occurs and outrage and debate is renewed.

During these lazy August days, we seem to be in the complacent period. Congress is in recess and everyone seems to have pulled back from fighting to end the brutality of this war. The fact of the matter is that despite the rhetoric and resolutions presented in Congress over the last few months, we still haven't found a consensus within the Democratic Party and among anti-war forces on how and when to bring our troops home.

While public support for ending the war has reached record levels, we seem to be stuck. Our party, and perhaps our nation, appears to believe that replacing Bush in 2008 will solve everything.

But we just can’t wait that long.

Even during these quiet days, death and destruction continue in Iraq. Civilians and soldiers are dying, while cities and infrastructure burn. The Iraqi government is falling apart and political divisions abound. We are not moving forward in Iraq – we are just standing still.

For the families who are losing loved ones in Iraq, the war still roars into their lives. While our soldiers still die their names are usually in the back pages of the newspapers. It isn’t considered news anymore unless we can break a monthly record for number of killed. If the tally of our soldiers killed isn’t in the triple digits for that month then it isn’t front page news.

Also remember that thousands are being injured and maimed. A short while ago the pages of our papers were filled with stories about appalling conditions at our veteran hospitals and the improper care and treatment of our injured. Everyone knows this problem has not been resolved but we no longer hear about this injustice to our wounded.

Meanwhile, only increasingly violent and deadly acts bring the war back to the front page here at home. Just last week, the media briefly focused on massive terrorist bombings in Arbil that killed at least 250 from the small Yazidi sect in Northern Iraq – the most civilians killed in a single coordinated attack so far. However, the media’s attention proved to be fleeting once again.

It is immoral to wait for the next election as a solution.. Even assuming that a Democrat is elected President, a new administration could not pull troops out for at least six months after a January 2009 inauguration. Two more years of death and destruction is simply not acceptable.Iraq167 

We have to demand that our leaders be unrelenting in their opposition. That we stop waiting for reports to be issued. That this administration hear the people’s voice against this war every single day until it’s over. Otherwise the names of our dead will just continue to grow. Young names whose future has been take from them for no reason. Some young teenagers will die in this war have known war for 25% of their short lives.

The death continues and we are complicit. How can we continue to send our young men and women to die in a futile war while we wait?

July 20, 2007

War on Terror: A National Disgrace

I imagine that a lot of Americans felt pretty disgusted after they read the front page of yesterday’s New York Times. After nearly six years of fighting the War on Terror, a classified report shows that Al Qaeda is stronger than ever and that we are no safer here at home. _40164368_graffiti3

What the hell happened?

Having read through the Times coverage and additional information from other sources, let me break down these revelations for you:

Despite six years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is now clear that Al Qaeda is making a startling come back. Listen to this assessment presented in the first paragraphs of the Times story:

“The intelligence report, the most formal assessment since the Sept. 11 attacks about the terrorist threat facing the United States, concludes that the United States is losing ground on a number of fronts in the fight against Al Qaeda and describes the terrorist organization as having significantly strengthened over the past two years.”

We have reached this astounding point after spending hundreds of billions of dollars, losing tens of thousands of lives around the world and witnessing destruction on a mass scale. We have thrown our military into battle without adequate political and diplomatic support and as a result, the American force structure is broken and stretched thin. As a result of profligate spending and a lack of foresight, we have sacrificed our future at home by adding unfathomable sums to the national debt. We have seen the best and brightest of our country’s young return home in boxes or badly injured.

Well, at least we can rely on the Department of Homeland Security to prepare the country for another terrorist attack, right? Unfortunately, we now know because of Hurricane Katrina that our government is unable to prepare even for foreseeable natural disasters. While seniors, people with disabilities and the poor were stranded in New Orleans, federal and state agencies couldn’t figure out how to distribute water and food to desperate citizens.

Clearly, we are still unprepared, after having spent billions to create the Department of Homeland Security, for an American city to come under siege. Amazingly, Secretary Chertoff remains in his position almost two years after presiding over the greatest debacle in the history of federal emergency management. Do you feel safer?

Both abroad and at home, there has been one failure after another throughout this so-called War Against Terror. Do we stop and think that perhaps another approach might be wiser? Hell, no. Instead, we send aircraft carriers to the Persian Gulf to provoke a conflict with Iran and send covert forces into the Northwest tribal areas of Pakistan. At home, we haven’t allocated enough resources towards preparing our big cities for potential terrorist attack or securing our ports.

A few months back, I wrote about how unfolding events in Pakistan particularly scare me. Today, that country is moving even more rapidly towards disaster than I had projected. Bombings and civil unrest are a way of life. The central government has little to no control over the Northwest areas. General Musharraf, at our urging, is increasingly cracking down on internal dissent, creating martyrs and momentum for the extremists’ campaign. Pakistan is a tinderbox and one step away from becoming a militant Islamic state.

Here is the clincher.

Pakistan has in hand forty to sixty nuclear warheads, and not weapons that might be developed in five years like Iran, but operational missiles systems. Can you imagine these weapons falling into the hands of Islamic terrorists? Images22

We now know that the War in Iraq has added scores to the terrorists’ ranks, and that our increasing failure in Afghanistan has led to the resurgence of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Meanwhile, we have lost any goodwill and all influence in Iran and Syria.

Now, here is a radical solution.

Let's sit down and talk something we should have done from day one.    Maybe it is time to seek common ground among our partners and enemies in order to build peace instead of expanding this failed war.

Why not? At this point, I don’t think we have much to lose, especially given the costs of war to date. With what have spent in treasure, lives lost and diplomatic capital, we could have vastly improved our lot at home and shared responsibility for a better world with other nations.

In business, we often say that a return on investment is a critical success factor. The cost of this campaign – the War on Terror – has been astronomically high and the return has been disappointingly low.  Everyone knows that except our Chief Executive President Bush.  How much damage will we allow him to do before bringing this under control?

Nevertheless, the bottom line is that something has to change and change soon, before it’s too late.

July 10, 2007

Now Is the Time, Bring Them Home

There have been moments in our history when all the right factors aligned to create a tipping point from which anything was possible.

Right now is such a moment. We have the opportunity to end this war and bring the troops home.

Soldiers20fight20iraqThere are many new factors that have come into play during the last several weeks. Several loyal Republican senators distanced themselves from the President’s war policy. The most influential newspaper in America, The New York Times, called for immediate withdrawal. Majority Leader Harry Reid committed himself and the Democratic majority to taking on Bush’s failed war policies in the United States Senate. Turkey rallied more than 100,000 troops on their border with Iraq.

While everyone has their own idea on how to save face, it is clear that there is only one option left: withdrawal. We should demand and expect that our presidential candidates exert real leadership, put the political jockeying aside and unite behind a single proposal of immediate withdrawal from Iraq.

Because of the incompetent initiation and execution of the war, very little middle ground remains. It is no longer enough to call for some drawn-out exit strategy that will inevitably lead to the unnecessary deaths of American soldiers. It is no longer enough for our Democratic leaders and candidates to be cautious and politically correct. Now is the time for real leaders to stand and be counted. Now is the time to forcefully advocate for an end to this madness.

The sectarian civil war is relentlessly escalating and recent suicide bombings have resulted in hundreds of civilian casualties. Turkey is massing an enormous number of troops, who are obviously preparing to cross the border into the Kurdish territories. How will we react if the Turks invade northern Iraq? We run the risk of being drawn into a regional war if we stay in Iraq much longer.

This war has sucked the life out of our domestic programs and increasingly more and more money is being poured into this disaster. The estimated cost of the Iraq War is $440,000,000,000 as of today! With that amount of money, can you imagine the number of schools that could have been built, the hundreds of thousands of children enrolled in Head Start, millions of hungry people fed, serious alternative energy sources developed, full college scholarships awarded and the list can go on! New Orleans still lies in a shambles. Our farmers are suffering a great drought. The people of our nation need help and need it now.

It appears that we have been given a perfect moment to act. Who knows how long it will last before some outside factor intrude. We must act now.

July 09, 2007

New York Times: Out of Iraq Now!

A historic and powerful editorial in yesterday’s New York Times called for the immediate withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. This editorial may go down as one of the paper’s most important and principled. In a careful and deliberate manner, the editors outlined how America should begin the process of a sane and safe withdrawal. Considering the paper’s difficulty during the ramp up to war, this editorial marks a momentous turning point. 030407_war11amupdate05_jpg

The editorial starts off with saying:

It is time for the United States to leave Iraq, without any more delay than the Pentagon needs to organize an orderly exit.

And continues:

Like many Americans, we have put off that conclusion, waiting for a sign that President Bush was seriously trying to dig the United States out of the disaster he created by invading Iraq without sufficient cause, in the face of global opposition, and without a plan to stabilize the country afterward.

At first, we believed that after destroying Iraq’s government, army, police and economic structures, the United States was obliged to try to accomplish some of the goals Mr. Bush claimed to be pursuing, chiefly building a stable, unified Iraq. When it became clear that the president had neither the vision nor the means to do that, we argued against setting a withdrawal date while there was still some chance to mitigate the chaos that would most likely follow.

While Mr. Bush scorns deadlines, he kept promising breakthroughs — after elections, after a constitution, after sending in thousands more troops. But those milestones came and went without any progress toward a stable, democratic Iraq or a path for withdrawal. It is frighteningly clear that Mr. Bush’s plan is to stay the course as long as he is president and dump the mess on his successor. Whatever his cause was, it is lost.

And the editorial ends with:

President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have used demagoguery and fear to quell Americans’ demands for an end to this war. They say withdrawing will create bloodshed and chaos and encourage terrorists. Actually, all of that has already happened — the result of this unnecessary invasion and the incompetent management of this war.

This country faces a choice. We can go on allowing Mr. Bush to drag out this war without end or purpose. Or we can insist that American troops are withdrawn as quickly and safely as we can manage — with as much effort as possible to stop the chaos from spreading.

I strongly urge all of you to read this New York Times editorial. For anyone who feels that now is not the time to leave, it’s a must read.

June 18, 2007

Iraq: A Moral Issue Not A Political Issue

The War in Iraq rages on and on with a life of its own and no one seems able or willing to stop it. The death and devastation continues on a daily basis and we have grown accustomed to news reports of faith based Shrines being blown up, suicide bombs in marketplaces killing hundreds of civilians and American soldiers dying at an increasing pace. Coffinsoutdoors

There is no sign of stabilization or conditions improving. This week the papers carried sidebar stories that Turkey is weighing its options on a possible invasion of the Kurds in the North. The hawks in Vice President Cheney’s office have started the process of laying the groundwork to expand the War into Iran. Gaza is a battleground and Beirut is burning. Afghanistan is again in jeopardy. The entire region seems ready to explode into a greater conflict because of our actions

Everything seems to continue to spin out of control. Congress is not using the power of the purse to set deadlines and bring our troops home. Presidential candidates in both parties are seeking that safe political place to appease their constituencies without looking weak or non supportive of our men and women in the military.

When I was in Washington this week and pushing people to take a hard line on the War, the Democratic insiders lectured me to be practical and to understand the Party has done everything politically possible to end the killing and to do more would hurt our chances in the election. They told me that I knew when he/she is elected; they will start bringing troops home.

What I do know is that grief has become too common place in too many American homes. Because of our lies and deceit, we have witnessed an entire nation, being destroyed. Because of our actions, a region is on the verge of a horrible conflict that might be unstoppable. Because of our actions, tens of thousands of injured American soldiers are going through painful rehabilitation as they learn to think again, to walk again and even to talk again.

By being politically practical and cheering our politicians as they promise that when we take over the White House that they will bring our troops home, we are basically saying we can wait two years. That means two more years of death and destruction. Even then we are not sure if these candidates will keep their word. We could learn that our new President will not want to start their Presidency being viewed as weak on defense and will hesitate to have their first Presidential action to be a withdrawal of troops.

This is not a political issue. As each day passes this endless slaughter is becoming one of the great moral issues of our times. Future generations will judge each and every one of our leaders on how hard they worked, how much courage they showed and what kind of leadership they offered to bring this tragic chapter in our history to a close.04_07_iraq_l_s_2 

This is a time where greatness should be expected from those we elected. The powerful should speak with great moral authority about ending this war now. Former Presidents and others in leadership positions must make it a daily priority to end the war. We should be taking care of our own here at home who are hungry, unemployed and undereducated.

Being politically practical almost guarantees that this war will continue through the election. How do you tell parents that their son or daughter had to die because the political will was absent and the political timing was wrong?

Congress appears to have given up. Bush continues to ignore anything approaching reality. I know what being politically practical means. There is a time and place to measure your words and actions. There is a time and place for compromise and cautiously moving forward. 

This is not such a time. It is now a time that demands great moral and uncompromising leadership that does not expect us to wait until someone places a hand on the Bible in front of the Capitol Building. It is time for courage, conviction and leadership.

May 17, 2007

VoteVets Calls Out Moderate Republicans on Iraq

As we’ve recently discussed in the blog, VoteVets.org has launched a series of strong advertisements across the nation featuring former Army generals. The organization is airing their ads to attack Republican moderates on Iraq war policy in their home states.

VoteVets is a remarkable anti-war organization, comprised of prominent military leaders and veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In light of all that’s going on in Iraq today, it’s encouraging to see career military men and life-long Republicans stand up to President Bush and an indecisive Congress.

Their message is two-fold. First, this misguided and poorly planned war is dangerously impacting all of our troops, including their readiness to fight and their well-being. And remember, these folks know better than most what it’s like to actually fight a war, certainly better than Bush, Cheney and most of Congress.

Second, they say that Iraq is increasing global terrorism and the threat to America, while limiting our ability to commit resources to fight extremists in Afghanistan and around the world. Watch the videos below and consider who these men are:

General Wesley Clark: A 34-year Army veteran and Former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO who commanded Operation Allied Force in the Kosovo War. He was Democratic candidate for President in 2004.

Major General John Batiste: A 31-year Army veteran who commanded 22,000 soldiers in the Army’s 1st Infantry Division in Iraq from 2004 to 2005

Major General Paul Eaton: A 33-year Army veteran who was the Commanding General responsible for reestablishing Iraqi Security Forces from 2003-2004. .

May 10, 2007

Iraq: $424,000,000,000 and Counting

According to Cost of War we are approaching the half trillion mark for the cost of the Iraq War to American taxpayers. That is a straggling amount. Every aspect of our society has suffered from this War’s high cost and there appears no end in sight! 11354_24

Once again, it is important that we take just a moment and appreciate what this War is costing us as a country. According to the calculations of Cost of War, this is what we could have done with the same money.

We could have given full scholarships for four years at state university’s to over 20,000, 0000 young Americans.

With the funds from this War, we could have hired over 7,000,000 new teachers for our schools for one year.

Shelter could have been provided for millions as we could have built over 3,800,000 new housing units.

An astounding 56,000,000 children could have been sent to one full year of Head Start and had a decent chance from the beginning of their lives.

Finally we could purchase health insurance for one year for over 254,000,000 children in the world.

These are just examples of what we can do with the money we are spending in Iraq. Image the transit systems we could have built, the trees that could have been planted, the rivers that could have been cleaned, the number of people that could have been trained for jobs and the research and development we could have completed as a nation.

This War is costing us our future.

May 09, 2007

Former Army General Speaks Out on Iraq

In a new advertisement from VoteVets.org, former U.S. Army Major General John Batiste calls out President Bush for failing to listen to the advice of commanders on the ground in Iraq. General Batiste, who commanded the Army’s 1st Infantry Division in Iraq, resigned in protest to speak out about the war. His powerful voice adds to the chorus of Americans, nearly 60% in a recent poll, who want Congress to take action now to end this war.

May 08, 2007

Iraq: Surge in American Dead

When the Iraq War began, the death of a single soldier was front page news all across the country. Dramatic images of the fallen were placed above the fold alongside interviews with family members. Collectively, individual communities and the nation felt a great sense of loss. Images

Now after four years of war, I am afraid we have become numb to the escalating death and destruction. On Sunday, we lost eight soldiers in combat and today, I had to search hard to remember the correct number. By this morning, most of the Internet news Web sites had moved on to other stories or the news was buried deep in the clutter. The newspapers are reporting these deaths in the back pages and broadcast media will no longer lead the evening news with the story of eight Americans dying in Iraq.

Even the return of Roger Clemens to the New York Yankees got more coverage on The New York Times Web site.

Some morning this week, a little box will appear in USA Today listing the names and the ages of the soldiers. Then, they will be simply added to the cold statistic that counts the 3,000 plus causalities of war. There will be no pictures, no interviews with their families, and we will never really know as a nation what talents we lost in these young men.

A callousness has set in and as a result, the real story of the Iraq War remains untold. The number of deaths required to make news continues to grow. It might take 15 or 20 American deaths in one day in order for the day-to-day impact of the war to reclaim the front page. At least until that becomes common place and the bar is raised even higher.

Paradoxically, we are in fact seeing a significant surge in the number of American dead in Iraq. Last month, more than 100 soldiers were killed and we seem to be on the same pace this month. Buried in the stories on Iraq today, an American commander warned that we might see the death toll rise sharply as the “Bush Surge” becomes a reality. Certainly, we will mark the statistical milestone of 3,500 or 4,000 dead. Some magazine will print their pictures and we will be blown away once again by the sad stories of children whose young fathers will never come home. And then, we will continue on without real reflection or shared sacrifice, business as usual.

I have thought a lot about the eight who died yesterday. I have wondered how old these soldiers were and what their lives were like. What would they have become if lies had not taken them to war? Would they have farmed the land, built our cars, or become doctors and saved lives? Had they missed out on the frivolous adventures of youth and lost their innocence to a misbegotten war? Were they able to see a new born son or daughter before they died?

I want to know more about them. It seems hu